IJHEM
Print ISSN 2054-9849 Online ISSN 2054-9857 ICO Registration Number: ZA522255
Accepting submissions

Article Details

Volume 01 Issue 2

Computer Self Efficacy, Computer-related Technology Dependence and On-line Learning Readiness of Undergraduate Students

Published: 11 Apr 2015 Issue:Volume 01 Issue 2 Feb 2015 Author details below

ACHUKWU CHIMEZIE B

Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka

NWOSU KINGSLEY CHINAZA

Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka

UZOEKWE HELEN EFEYAELU

Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka

AKUEZILO JULIANA

Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka

Download PDF Reading View How to Cite BibTeX / RIS XML Metadata JSON Metadata View Issue
Share

Article Metrics Report

Views, downloads, citations, engagement

Cited by

Current citation count

Research summary

The study investigated undergraduates’ computer self-efficacy, computer-related technology dependence and their online learning readiness. It adopted a correlational study and using simple random sampling technique 129 first year undergraduates were sampled. Major findings indicated that male undergraduates have higher mean scores in computer self-efficacy and online readiness than female students, while females had slightly higher mean scores in computer related technology dependence. Gender significant differences occurred only in computer self-efficacy. Self-efficacy increased significantly with years of experience. However, students’ years of use of computer did not account for significant differences in computer-related technology dependence and their online learning readiness. There was significant relationship between computer self-efficacy, and computer-related technology dependence of undergraduates (r=.323, p<.05). Computer self-efficacy also significantly correlated with students online-readiness (r=.330, p<.05). Positive correlation occurred between students’ computer-related technology dependence and their online readiness (r=.273, p<.05). Computer self-efficacy and computer-related technology dependence predicted students’ online learning readiness. It was recommended that stakeholders should endeavour to provide the computer facilities; train students; build up their computer self-efficacies; and to motivate female undergraduate students in the use o

Article History

Published 11 Apr 2015

How to Cite

B, A. C., Chinaza, N. K., Efeyaelu, U. H., & Juliana, A.. (2015). Computer Self Efficacy, Computer-related Technology Dependence and On-line Learning Readiness of Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Higher Education Management, Volume 01 Issue 2.

Citation Context

Archive cited by No internal citing article yet
Reference depth 37 sources listed
DOI record DOI not listed
Citation signal Citation exports and metadata ready

APA

B, A. C., Chinaza, N. K., Efeyaelu, U. H., & Juliana, A.. (2015). Computer Self Efficacy, Computer-related Technology Dependence and On-line Learning Readiness of Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Higher Education Management, Volume 01 Issue 2.

MLA

B, Achukwu Chimezie, et al.. "Computer Self Efficacy, Computer-related Technology Dependence and On-line Learning Readiness of Undergraduate Students." International Journal of Higher Education Management, Volume 01 Issue 2, 2015.

Chicago

Achukwu Chimezie B, Nwosu Kingsley Chinaza, Uzoekwe Helen Efeyaelu, and Akuezilo Juliana. "Computer Self Efficacy, Computer-related Technology Dependence and On-line Learning Readiness of Undergraduate Students." International Journal of Higher Education Management Volume 01 Issue 2 (11 Apr 2015).

Harvard

B, A. C., Chinaza, N. K., Efeyaelu, U. H., & Juliana, A. (2015) Computer Self Efficacy, Computer-related Technology Dependence and On-line Learning Readiness of Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Higher Education Management, Volume 01 Issue 2

References

  • Aydin, C. H., & Tasci, D. (2005). Measuring readiness for e-learning: Reflections from an 
  • emerging country. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (4), 244-257.
  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior. New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  • Bandura, A. (2000). Cultivate self-efficacy for personal and organizational effectiveness. 
  • In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Handbook of Principles of Organization Behavior. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Capara, G. V. & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72, (1), 187-206.
  • Barbeite, F. G, & Weiss, E. M. (2004). Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. Computers in Human Behavior 20 (2004) 1–15.
  • Bauer, W. I. (2003). Gender differences and the computer self-efficacy of pre-service music teachers. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 2, (1),9-15.
  • Brosnan, M. J. (1998). The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14, 223-234.
  • Chou C., Condron, L. & Belland, J. C. (2005). A review of the research on internet addiction. Educational Psychology Review, 17,(4), 363-388.
  • Cintrón, R. & Lang, J. R. (nd). Preparing students for online education: A case study of a readiness module
  • Doyle, E., Stamouli, I.  & Huggard, M.  (2005). Computer anxiety, self-efficacy, computer experience: An investigation throughout a Computer Science degree. A paper presented at the 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Indianapolis, IN.
  • Ekizoglu, N. & Ozcinar, Z. (2010). The relationship between the teacher candidates’ computer and internet based anxiety and perceived self-efficacy. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2 (2010) 5881–5890.
  • Galpin, V., Sanders, I., Turner, H. & Venter, B. (2005). Gender and educational background and their effect on computer self-efficacy and perceptions. http://www.cs.wits.ac.za/
  • Galy, E., Downey, C., & Johnson, J. (2011). The effect of using e-learning tools in online and campus-based classrooms on student performance. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, 209-229.
  • Hall, S. & Vance, E. A. (2010). Improving self-efficacy in Statistics: Role of self-explanation and feedback. Journal of Statistics Education, 18, (3), 1-22.
  • Hong, J., Chiu, P., Shih, H. & Lin, P. (2012). Computer self-efficacy, competitive anxiety and flow state: Escaping from firing online game. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11, (3), 70-76.
  • Hung, M. Chou, C., Chen, C., & Own, Z. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55, 1080–1090.
  • Hsiao, C.,  Lin, Y., &  Tu, Y. (2010). Gender differences in computer experience and computer self-efficacy among high school teachers. The Second Asian Conference on Education Official Conference Proceedings, Osaka, Japan.
  • Khorrami-Arani, O. (2001). Researching computer self-efficacy. International Education Journal 2,( 4),17-24 http://www.flinders.edu.au/education/iej
  • James, D. (nd). Refining the scope in computer self-efficacy relationships: An empirical comparison of three instruments in predicting competence and attitudes
  • Lunenburg, F. C. (2011).  Self-Efficacy in the workplace: Implications for motivation and performance. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration,14, (1), 1-6.
  • Min-Hsun, S. & Pey-Chewn, D. (2012). EFL learners’ language learning strategy use and perceived self-efficacy. European Journal of Social Sciences, 27, (3), 335-345.
  • Shu, Tu & Wang (2011): The Impact of Computer Self-Efficacy and Technology 
  • Dependence on Computer-Related Technostress: A Social Cognitive Theory Perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27 (10), 923-939.
  • Salau, M. O. (2012). ICT in schools: Policy, practice, achievement and challenges. . In U. M. O. Ivowi and B. B. Akpan (Eds). Education in Nigeria: From beginning to the future. Lagos: Foremost Educational Services Ltd.
  • Sam, H. K., Othman, A. E. A., & Nordin, Z. S. (2005). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and attitudes toward the internet: A Study among Undergraduates in Unimas. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (4), 205-219.
  • Schreurs, Sammour & Ehlers (nd). ERA - e-learning readiness analysis: A eHealth case study of e-learning readiness.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 207-231.
  • Siegle, D. & McCoach, D. B. (2007). Increasing student mathematics self-efficacy through teacher training. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18, (2), 278-312.
  • Simsek, A. (2011). The relationship between computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy.  Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(3), 177-187.
  • Smith, P. J. (2005). Learning preferences and readiness for online learning. Educational Psychology, 25, (1), 3-12.
  • Stajkovic, A. D. & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, (2), 240-260. 
  • Vekiri, I., & Chronaki, A. (2008). Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Computers & Education, 51, 1392–1404
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000).Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 82–91.
  • Zulkosky, K. (2009). Self-efficacy: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum, 44, (2), 93-102

Related Articles

Browse Articles

Dialectical contradictions in postgraduate business education: A Framework for enhancing teaching and learning in UK higher education
The importance of relationships and communication in student satisfaction at Rey Juan Carlos University
Leveraging Eco-Visual Literacy to Manage Affective Engagement in Higher Education: A Case Study in Curricular Innovation
Strategic plans and their contents: What are the important issues in higher education?
Digital transformations & innovations in business PG Education: Rethinking curriculum development and teaching practices
Path models for predicting prudential judgment And legal ability of educational managers
Modernising the curriculum and pedagogy - to be or not to be? using film and online video to engage students and enhance learning
Social media as a tool in learning and social behavior in Saudi Arabia
An empirical study on user acceptance of ERP system by international students in Chinese HEIs: A TAM approach
Redefining education: the convergence of liberal arts and career school education
Dialectical contradictions in postgraduate business education: A Framework for enhancing teaching and learning in UK higher education
The importance of relationships and communication in student satisfaction at Rey Juan Carlos University
Leveraging Eco-Visual Literacy to Manage Affective Engagement in Higher Education: A Case Study in Curricular Innovation
Strategic plans and their contents: What are the important issues in higher education?
Digital transformations & innovations in business PG Education: Rethinking curriculum development and teaching practices