citizen developer, andragogy, low-code no-code, design thinking, constructivism, knowledge-based dynamic capabilities

Addressing the ongoing deficit in technical skills and talent necessitates an effective management approach that can harness the power of accelerating innovation. In response to the challenge, this paper presents a comprehensive learning model called Citizen Development Andragogy (CDA), specifically tailored for adult learners. CDA is an integrative learning framework, designed for an array of academic programs from micro-credentialing to four-year degrees, which combines leading-edge technology, such as low-code tools and platforms and generative AI, design thinking for creativity, and the institutionally oriented, knowledge-based dynamic capabilities (KBDC) model. Additionally, CDA is epistemologically rooted in the individually focused constructivist learning theory, providing a consistent structure that caters to the learning needs of working adults, enhancing their ability to conceive, design, build, and implement digital solutions. The andragogical learning theory is designed for adult learners and has important implications regarding teaching and program differences for reaching traditional aged college students, emerging learners, versus more seasoned individuals. Emerging strategic components conveyed in this paper—via a discursive style—represent some first steps towards considering and building a citizen development andragogy. An initial CDA framework conceptualization is detailed in this paper, which explores its theoretical constructs, practical considerations, current limitations, and it also shares insights from early implementation efforts, and presents a variety of potential future research avenues. Importantly, the paper emphasizes CDA's role as an accessible gateway for introducing citizen development into adult education and upskilling programs. In a broader societal context, citizen development, facilitated by CDA, can serve as a vital influencer for larger 'citizen' involvement movements like citizen scientists, human rights observers, and environmentalists. As such, an effective, scalable CDA prototype has the potential to yield meaningful benefits, empowering individuals, and organizations to achieve impact on an unprecedented scale, ultimately benefitting society at large

• Abrell, T. (2016). Design thinking and Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Integration and Avenues for Future Research. In W. Brenner & F. Uebernickel, F. (Eds) (2016). Design thinking for Innovation | Research and Practice (pp. 25-39). New York, NY: Springer.
• Accelerate software development utilizing citizen developers | Citizen development: five keys to success (n.d.). Retrieved on February 3, 2023 from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/operations/articles/5-keys-to-success-with-citizen-developers.html
• Acklin, C. (2013). Design Management Absorption Model: A Framework to Describe and Measure the Absorption of Knowledge by SMEs with Little or no Prior Experience. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 147-160.
• Allen, D. B., Fukami, C.V. & Wittmer, D. P. (2021). A course on building the future of work: Building the scaffold while standing on it. Journal of Management Education, 46(1), 178-209.
• Allen, S. J. (2020). On the cutting edge or the chopping block? Fostering a digital mindset and tech literacy in business management education. Journal of Management Education, 44(3), 362-393.
• Allen, S. J., Rosch, D. M. & Riggio, R. E. (2022). Advancing leadership education and development: Integrating adult learning theory. Journal of Management Education, 46(2), 252-283.
• Alston, E. (2023).  How to automate OpenAI: Get even more from AI by adding automation to your workflows. https://zapier.com/blog/automate-openai/?utm_source=Iterable&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=itbl-gbl-pgv-evr-blog_automate_openai_20230403-horizontal
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
• Link to original article:
• https://www.miguelangelmartinez.net/IMG/pdf/1969_Arnstein_participation_ladder_AJP.pdf
• Baumgarten, C., Simeon, A., & Wilhelm, M. C. (2020). Citizen Developers Driving the Digital Campus. https://www.eunis.org/eunis2020/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2020/05/49-Baumgarten-eunis2020_CitizenDevelopersDrivingDigitalCampusV1.0-abstract.pdf
• Benson, J. & Dresdow, S. (2014). Design thinking: A fresh approach for transformative assessment practice. Journal of Management Education, 38(3), 436-461.
• Brenner, W., Uebernickel, F., & Abrell, T. (2016). Design thinking as Mindset, Process, and Toolbox Experiences from Research and Teaching at the University of St. Gallen. In W. Brenner & F. Uebernickel, F. (Eds) (2016), 3-21. Design thinking for Innovation | Research and Practice. New York, NY: Springer.
• Bridging the App Gap: How Citizen Development Is Changing Business (n.d.). Retrieved on April 7, 2022, from https://www.salesforce.com/products/platform/best-practices/citizen-development/
• Bower, M. (2017). Design Thinking and Learning Design. In M. Bower, Design of Technology-Enhanced Learning: Integrating Research and Practice, pp. 121-158. Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-182-720171008
• Chew, E., Jones, N., & Turner, D. (2008). Critical Review of the Blended Learning Models Based on Maslow’s and Vygotsky’s Educational Theory. In J. Fong, R. Kwan, F. L. Wang (eds) Hybrid Learning and Education. ICHL 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5169. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
• Chui, M., Manyika, J., & Miremadi, M. (2016). Where machines could replace humans—and where they can’t (yet). McKinsey Quarterly. http://dln.jaipuria.ac.in:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2951/1/Where-machines-could-replace-humans-and-where-they-cant-yet.pdf
• Citizen Developer (n.d.). In Gartner Glossary. Retrieved on April 7, 2022, from https://www.gartner.com/en/information-technology/glossary/citizen-developer
• Citizen development: Your one-way ticket to the future (2020, November 17). Quixy. https://quixy.com/blog/citizen-development-future/
• Civic Activism (n.d.). Retrieved on February 3, 2023, from https://isd.iss.nl/home/civic-activism/
• Cousins, B. (2018). Validating a Design thinking Strategy: Merging Design thinking and Absorptive Capacity to Build a Dynamic Capability and Competitive Advantage. Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 102-120.
• Dachner, A.M., & Polin, B. (2016). A systematic approach to educating the emerging adult learner in undergraduate management courses. Journal of Management Education, 40(2), 121-151.
• Devaraj, S., Hicks, M. J., Wornell, E. J. & Faulk, D. (2017). How vulnerable are American communities to automation, trade & urbanization? https://www.scribd.com/document/354359125/Vulnerability-20170719#fullscreen&from_embed
• Everhard, J. (2019, January 22). The Pros and Cons of Citizen Development. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johneverhard/2019/01/22/the-pros-and-cons-of-citizen-development/?sh=32465dc284fd
• Ferreira, D., & MacLean, G. (2018). Andragogy in the 21st century: Applying the assumptions of adult learning online. Language Research Bulletin, 32(1), 11-19.
• Ford, N. (2018). 5 Ways Low-Code Platforms Are Taking the Strain in the Developer Skills Gap. https://dzone.com/articles/5-ways-low-code-platforms-are-taking-the-strain-in-1
• Fraisl, D., Campbell, J., See, L., Wehn, U., Wardlaw, J., Gold, M., & Fritz, S. (2020). Mapping citizen science contributions to the UN sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science, 15(6), 1735-1751.
• Fung, A. (2006). Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66-75. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667
• Garud, R., Jain, S. & Tuertscher, P. (2008). Incomplete by Design and Designing for Incompleteness. Organization Studies, 29(3), 351-373 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088
• Glen, R., Suciu, C., & Baughn, C. (2015). Teaching design thinking in business schools. The International Journal of Management Education, 13, 182-192.
• Glen, R., Suciu, C., & Baughn, C. (2014). The need for design thinking in business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(4), 653-667.
• Grisenthwaite, J. (2020, April 28). Talent Transformation: Automation, Upskilling, and the Rise of the Citizen Developer. Recruiter.
• Gruber, M., De Leon, N., George, G., & Thompson, P. (2015). Managing by design. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 1-7.
• Harlow, S., Cummings, R., & Aberasturi, S. M. (2007). Karl Popper and Jean Piaget: A Rationale for Constructivism. The Educational Forum, 71(1), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720608984566
• Hayes, N. (2022, July1). Common Sources of Illumination: Intersections of Andragogy, Prior Learning. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 18(2), 14-22.
• Hummelgaard, P. (2020). The jobs forecast is unsettled. It's time for a reskilling revolution. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/01/denmark-reskilling-revolution-future-of-work
• Johannessen, C., & Davenport, T. (2021, June 22). When Low-Code/No-Code Development Works — and When It Doesn’t. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/06/when-low-code-no-code-development-works-and-when-it-doesnt
• Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
• Ismail, N. (2017). 4 requirements of a low-code development platform. https://www.information-age.com/4-requirements-low-code-development-platform-123469520/
• Kaur, V. (2019). Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities | The Road Ahead in Gaining Organizational Competitiveness. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
• Kaur, V. (2020). Knowledge-Based Dynamic Capabilities: The Panacea for Pandemic. California Management Review. https://cmr.berkeley.edu/2020/04/kbdc/
• Kaur, V. (2023a). Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities: A scientometric analysis of the marriage between knowledge management and dynamic capabilities. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2022-0112
• Kaur, V. (2023b). Multinational orchestration: a meta-theoretical approach toward competitive advantage. Critical Perspectives on International Business. https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-11-2021-0090
• Kaur, V. (2023c). Managerial attention and knowledge-based dynamic capabilities: A meta-theoretical approach to competitive advantage. Journal of General Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070221126275
• Kaur, V., & Mehta, V. (2018). Knowledge management process capabilities for competitive Advantage: A comparison of IT multinationals in India. JIMS8M: The Journal of Indian Management & Strategy, 23(1), 22-31.
• Kesting, P. & Ulhoi, J.P. (2010). Employee-driven innovation: extending the license to foster innovation. Management Decision Journal, 48(1), 65 –83.
• Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
• Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2014). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. London, UK: Routledge.
• Liedtka, J. (2017). Evaluating the impact of design thinking in action. Academy of Management Proceedings (1), 10264.
• Liedtka, J. (2018). Innovation, strategy, and design: Design thinking as a dynamic capability. Academy of Management Proceedings (1), 13004.
• Lohr, S. (2022). These Job-Training Programs Work, and May Show Others the Way, New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/03/business/these-job-training-programs-work-and-may-show-others-the-way.html
• Magistretti, S., Ardito, L., & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. (2021a). Framing the microfoundations of design thinking as a dynamic capability for innovation: Reconciling theory and practice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(6), 645-667.
• Magistretti, S., Pham, C. T. A., & Dell'Era, C. (2021b). Enlightening the dynamic capabilities of design thinking in fostering digital transformation. Industrial Marketing Management, 97, 59-70.
• Matthee, M. & Turpin, M. (2019). Invited Paper: Teaching Critical Thinking, Problem Solving, and Design thinking: Preparing IS Students for the Future. Journal of Information Systems Education, 30(4), 242-252.
• Metrolho, J. Ribeiro, F., & Araujo, R. (2020). A strategy for facing new employability trends using a low-code development platform, Applied Sciences, 10(1):12.
• Microsoft (2023). The Future of Work. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Bf-dbS9CcRU
• Moules, J. & Nilsson (2017, August 31). What employers want from MBA graduates — and what they don’t. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/3c380c00-80fc-11e7-94e2-c5b903247afd
• Nosko, A, & Széger, K. (2013). Active citizenship can change your country for the better. https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/active-citizenship-can-change-your-country-better
• Owen, C. L. (2006). Design thinking: Driving Innovation. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/50f1d855e4b0a42e43ebf428/t/56e99592859fd02c9c924c6e/1458148754827/Design-thinking-driving-innovation-owen_desthink06.pdf
• Ratcheva, V. S., & Leopold, T. (2018). 5 things to know about the future of jobs. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/09/future-of-jobs-2018-things-to-know/
• Rymer, J. & Koplowitz, R. (2019). The 13 Providers That Matter Most and How They Stack Up, Forrester Wave: Low-Code Development Platforms for AD&D Professionals, Q1 2019. https://www.forrester.com/report/The-Forrester-Wave-LowCode-Development-Platforms-For-ADD-Professionals-Q1-2019/RES144387
• Sahay, A. Indamutsa, A., Di Ruscio, D. & Pierantonio, A. (2020). Supporting the understanding and comparison of low-code development platforms, 2020 46th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), 2020, pp. 171-178, doi: 10.1109/SEAA51224.2020.00036.
• Schilders. S. & Taware, V. (2019). Innovation and Design thinking in Enterprise Architecture. https://www.infosysblogs.com/enterprise-architecture/2019/09/innovation_and_design_thinking.html
• Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Shepard, L. A. (2000). The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
• Silva, C., Vierra, J., Campos, J., Couto, R., & Ribeiro, A. (2021). Development and validation of a descriptive cognitive model for predicting usability issues in a low code development platform. Human Factors, 63(6), 1012–1032.
• Strategic Intelligence (n.d.). Retrieved on July 19, 2022, from https://intelligence.weforum.org/topics/a1Gb0000000LPFfEAO/key-issues/a1Gb00000015QodEAE?utm_source=Weforum&utm_medium=Topic+page+TheBigPicture&utm_campaign=Weforum_Topicpage_UTMs
• Suanmali, C. (1981). The core concepts of andragogy (8207343) [Doctoral dissertation]. Columbia University.
• Thacker, D., Berardi, V., Kaur, V., & Blundell, G., (2021). Business Students as Citizen Developers: Assessing Technological Self-Conception and Readiness. Information Systems Education Journal, 19(5), 15-30.
• Tschimmel, K. (2012). Design thinking as an effective Toolkit for Innovation. In: Proceedings of the XXIII ISPIM Conference: Action for Innovation: Innovating from Experience. Barcelona.
• Vailshery, L. S. (2021, September 21). Mid-sized companies are turning to low-code/no-code platforms, study finds. Venture Beat. https://venturebeat.com/business/mid-sized-companies-are-turning-to-low-code-no-code-platforms-study-finds/
• van den Berg, H.A. & Kaur, V. (2022). Individual knowledge measurement: organizational knowledge measured at the individual level. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(6), 1409-1437. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2020-0774
• Vroom, V. H. (1995). Work and motivation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
• Wadhwani P., & Loomba, S. (2021). Neobanking Market Size, By Account Type (Business Account, Savings Account), By Service (Mobile Banking, Payments & Money Transfer, Checking/Savings Account, Loans), By Application (Enterprises, Personal), COVID-19 Impact Analysis, Regional Outlook, Growth Potential, Competitive Market Share & Forecast, 2022–2028. Gminsights 2022. https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/neobanking-market
• What 52,000 people think about work today | PwC’s Global Workforce Hopes and Fears Survey 2022 (2022). https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/workforce/hopes-and-fears-2022.html
• Wike, R. & Stokes, B. (2015). In Advanced and Emerging Economies Alike, Worries About Job Automation. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2018/09/13/in-advanced-and-emerging-economies-alike-worries-about-job-automation/
• What is the fourth industrial revolution? (2016). https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/what-is-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/,
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
• World Bank (n.d.). Citizen Engagement. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/citizen-engagement
• Zahidi, S. (2020). We need a global reskilling revolution – here's why. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/01/reskilling-revolution-jobs-future-skills/
• Zidulka, A. & Mitchell, I.K. (2018). Creativity or Cooptation? Thinking Beyond Instrumentalism When Teaching Design Thinking. Journal of Management Education, 42(6), 749-760.