Academic journals, paper organization, publishing, research, writing

Publishing research in quality academic journals is always challenging. To improve the odds of publishing in the better business and allied social science journals, an author needs to get the paper off to a good start. To do that, much attention should be devoted to the paper’s introduction. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the introduction of some exemplary articles in the social sciences, primarily in the management and international business areas, and contrast those with some problematic examples. This research draws on a purposive sample and presents three of the exemplary article introductions for detailed discussion. Structural problems with the introduction are a major reason why otherwise good research can immediately run into problems with editors and reviewers. Thus, this paper contributes in providing guidance to authors in writing and organizing their introductions, from which they can also better organize and develop their full manuscripts and increase the odds of papers being accepted by good scholarly journals. Additional helpful examples and sources for authors are also provided and discussed

• Abrahamson, E. (2008). 22 things I hate: Mini rants on management research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(4), pp. 422–425.
• Acemoglu, F. & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business. 
• Ahlstrom, D. (2010). Publishing in the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(1), pp. 1–8.
• Ahlstrom, D. (2011a). On the aims and scope of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management: What does APJM really seek to publish? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(2), pp. 215-219.
• Ahlstrom, D. (2011b). Some helpful sources for prospective authors in Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(4), pp. 661-665.
• Ahlstrom, D. (2015a). From the Editors: Publishing in the Journal of World Business. Journal of World Business, 50(2), pp. 251-255.
• Ahlstrom, D. (2015b). Successful publishing in academic and scientific journals: Framing and organizing the scholarly paper. International Journal of Higher Education Management, 2(1), pp. 106-120.
• Ahlstrom, D. (2019). How are papers in the best journals in management organized and structured? A content analysis of top management journals.  Working paper, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
• Ahlstrom, D. & Bruton, G. D. (2014). Laying the foundations for Asia-focused research through qualitative research. In A. Fayolle and M. Wright, ed., How to get published in the best entrepreneurship journals: A guide to steer your academic career. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 183-200. 
• Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D. & Zhao, L. (2013). Turning good research into good publications. Nankai Business Review International, 4(2), pp. 92-106.
• Ahlstrom, D., Cumming, D. J. & Vismara, S. (2018). New methods of entrepreneurial firm financing: Fintech, crowdfunding and corporate governance implications. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(5), pp. 310-313.
• Ahlstrom, D., Levitas, E., Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T. & Zhu, H. (2014). The three faces of China: Strategic alliance partner selection in three ethnic Chinese economies. Journal of World Business, 49(4), pp. 572-585.
• Ahlstrom, D. & Wang, L. C. (2009). Groupthink and France's defeat in the 1940 campaign.  Journal of Management History, 15(2), pp. 159-177.
• Ahlstrom, D., Nair, A., Young, M. N. & Wang, L. C. (2006). China: Competitive myths and realities. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 71(4), pp. 4-10.
• Ahlstrom, D., Young, M. N., Nair, A. & Law, P. (2003). Managing the institutional environment: challenges for foreign firms in post WTO China. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 68(2), pp. 41-51.
• Anderson, E. & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: a transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(4), pp. 1–26.
• Bartunek, J. M. & Rynes, S. L. (2010). The construction and contributions of implications for practice: What’s in them and what might they offer? Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(1), pp. 100–117.
• Baruch, Y. (2016). Hitting your preferred target: positioning papers for different types of journals. In T. Clark, M. Wright & D. J. Ketchen, eds., How to get published in the best management journals. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 168-179.
• Belostecinic, F. (2017). Do countries import corruption? A micro analysis of Russia's trade partners in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 4(1), pp. 1-13.
• Bjørnskov, C. & Foss, N. J. (2016). Institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: What do we know and what do we still need to know? The Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(3), pp. 292–315.
• Boyd, B. (2016). The reviewers don’t like my sample! What can I do? In T. Clark, M. Wright & D. J. Ketchen, eds., How to get published in the best management journals. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 135-142.
• Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D. & Wan, J. C. (2003). Turnaround in East Asian firms: Evidence from ethnic overseas Chinese communities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(6), pp. 519-540.
• Buckley, P. J. & Casson, M. C. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Macmillan. 
• Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J. & Yap, A. J. (2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21(10), pp. 1363-1368.
• Cheever, N., Rosen, L., Carrier, L. M. & Chavez, A. (2014). Out of sight is not out of mind: The impact of restricting wireless mobile device use on anxiety levels among low, moderate and high users. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, pp. 290–297.
• Chrisman, J. J. & Patel, P. J. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and non-family firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), pp. 976–997.
• Christensen, C. M. & Carlile, P. R. (2009). Course research: Using the case method to build and teach management theory. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(2), pp. 240–251.
• Cialdini, R. B. (2005). What's the best secret device for engaging student interest? The answer is in the title. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(1), pp. 22-29.
• Clark, T., Wright, M. & Ketchen, D. J. (Eds.) (2016). How to get published in the best management journals. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
• Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1998). Research methods in science education. New York: Routledge.
• Colquitt, J. A. & Ireland, R. D. (2009). From the Editors: Taking the Mystery out of AMJ'S Reviewer Evaluation Form. The Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), pp. 224-228.
• Cooke, F. L. & Kim, S. (Eds.) (2018). Routledge handbook of human resource management in Asia. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
• Corley, K. G. & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), pp. 12–32.
• Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Cuddy, A. (2012). June. Amy Cuddy: Your body language may shape who you are [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/amy_cuddy_your_body_language_shapes_who_you_are
• Cuddy, A. (2018). Presence: Bringing your boldest self to your biggest challenges. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
• Cuddy, A. J. C., Schultz, S. J. & Fosse, N. E. (2018). P-Curving a more comprehensive body of research on postural feedback reveals clear evidential value for power-posing effects: Reply to Simmons and Simonsohn (2017). Psychological Science, 29(4), pp. 656-666.
• Cummings, L. L. & Frost, P. J. (Eds.) (1985). Publishing in the organizational sciences. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
• Cummings, L. L., & Frost, P. J. (Eds.) (1995). Publishing in the organizational sciences, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Daft, R. L. (1995). Why I recommended that your manuscript be rejected and what you can do about it. In L. L. Cummings and P. J. Frost (Eds.), Publishing in the organizational sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 164-182.
• Datta, P. & Jones, M. T. (2018). Being published in reputable academic and scientific journals: Key criteria for acceptance. International Journal of Higher Education Management, 5(1), pp. 49-63.
• Davis, M. S. (1971). That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(2), pp. 309–344.
• Dunbar, R. L. M. & Ahlstrom, D. (1995). Seeking the institutional balance of power: Avoiding the power of a balanced view. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1), pp. 171-192.
• Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., Van Essen, M. & Zellweger, T. (2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), pp. 1224-1264.
• Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K. & Pfarrer, M. D. (2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), pp. 5-34.
• Eden, D. (2008). What authors need to know to navigate the review process successfully: Understanding and managing the editor’s dilemma. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis. & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 239-249.
• Eloranta, J., Ojala, J. & Valtonen, H. (2010). Quantitative methods in business history: An impossible equation? Management & Organizational History, 5(1), pp. 79–107.
• Estrin, S. & Bhaumik, S. K. (2016). Publishing in management journals: how is it different from economics journals? In T. Clark, M. Wright and D. J. Ketchen, eds., How to get published in the best management journals. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp.  223-236.
• Fayolle, A., & Wright, M. (eds.) (2014). How to get published in the best entrepreneurship journals: A guide to steer your academic career. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
• Geletkanycz, M. & Tepper, B. J. (2012). Publishing in AMJ-Part 6_Discussing the implications.  Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), pp.  256-260.
• Grant, A. M. & Pollock, T. G. (2011). Publishing in AMJ – Part 3: Setting the hook. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), pp. 873-879.
• Hamilton, H. F. & Herwig, H. H. (2004). Decisions for War, 1914-1917. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
• Heppner, P. P. & Heppner, M. J. (2003). Writing and publishing your thesis, dissertation, and research: A guide for students in the helping professions. Mason, OH: Cengage.  
• Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P. & Kim, W. C. 1990. An eclectic theory of international market entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), pp. 117–128.
• Hitt, M. A., Ahlstrom, D., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E. & Svobodina, L. (2004). The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs. Russia. Organization Science, 15(2), pp. 173–185.
• Huang, C. L. (2007). Publish or perish! An editorial perspective. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 39(2), pp. 223-229.
• Huang, Y., Chen, A. & Kao, L. (2012). Corporate governance in Taiwan: The nonmonotonic relationship between family ownership and dividend policy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(1), pp. 39-58.
• Huff, A. S. (1998). Writing for scholarly publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Huff, A. S. (2008). Designing research for publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Jackson, S. E., Schuler, R. S. & Werner, S. (2012). Managing human resources (11e). Mason, OH: South-Western. 
• Kardefelt-Winther, D., Heeren, A., Schimmenti, A., van Rooij, A., Maurage, P., Carras, M., Edman, J., Blaszczynski, A., Khazaal, Y. & Billieux, J. (2017). Review: How can we conceptualize behavioural addiction without pathologizing common behaviours? Addiction, 112(10), pp. 1709-1715.
• Kerlinger, F. N. (1995). Foundations of behavioral research. Bangalore: Prism Books Private Limited.
• Kida, T. (2006). Don't believe everything you think: The 6 basic mistakes we make in thinking. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
• Kilduff, M. (2007). The top ten reasons why your paper might not be sent out for review. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 700-702.
• Konrad, A. M. (2008). Knowledge creation and the journal editor's role. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3-15. 
• Lewis-Beck, M. S., Bryman, A. & Liao, T. F, eds., (2003). The SAGE Encyclopedia of social science research methods, Volume 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 
• Li, Y., Ashkanasy, N. M. & Ahlstrom, D. (2014). The rationality of emotions: A hybrid process model of decision-making under uncertainty. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31 (1), pp. 293-308.
• Liu, X., Serger, S. S., Tagscherer, U. & Chang, A. Y. (2017).  Beyond catch-up—can a new innovation policy help China overcome the middle-income trap? Science and Public Policy, 44 (5), pp. 656–669.
• Liu, Y., Chen, Y-J. & Wang, L. C. (2017). Family business, innovation and organizational slack in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(1), pp. 193–213.
• Liu, Y., Wang, L. C., Zhao, L. & Ahlstrom, D. (2013). Board turnover In Taiwan’s public firms: An empirical study. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4), pp. 1059-1086.
• Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K. & Peng, M. W. (2009). Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), pp. 61–80.
• Meyer, K. E. & Peng, M. W. (2005). Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: transactions, resources, and institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6), pp. 600–621. 
• Nelson, R. R. (1991). Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12, (Special Issue: Fundamental Research Issues in Strategy and Economics, Winter), pp. 61-74.
• Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2): pp. 175–220.
• Peng, M. W. (2001). The resource-based view and international business. Journal of Management, 27(6), pp. 803–829.
• Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), pp. 275–296.
• Peng, M. W. (2008). Global Business. South-Western College Publishing: Cincinnati, OH.
• Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Carraher, S. M. & Shi, S. (2017). History and the debate over intellectual property. Management and Organization Review, 13 (1), pp. 15-38.
• Peng, M. W., Lee, S-H., & Wang, D. Y. L. (2005). What determines the scope of the firm over time? A focus on institutional relatedness. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), pp.  622-633.
• Peng, M. W., Li, Y. & Tian, L. (2016). Tian-ren-he-yi strategy: An Eastern perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33 (3), pp. 695-722.
• Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L. & Blevins, D. P. (2011). The social responsibility of international business scholars. Multinational Business Review, 19(2), pp. 106-119.
• Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A. & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9 (2), pp. 131-165.
• Rynes, S. L. (2002). From the editors: Some reflections on contribution. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), pp. 311–313.
• Sparrowe, R. T. & Mayer, K. J. (2011). Publishing in AMJ – Part 4: Grounding hypotheses. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), pp. 1098-1102.
• Su, Z., Ahlstrom, D., Li, J. & Cheng, D. (2013). Knowledge creation capability, absorptive capacity, and product innovativeness. R&D Management, 43(5), pp. 473-485. 
• Tomizawa, A., Zhao, L., Bassellier, G. & Ahlstrom, D. (2020). Economic growth, innovation, institutions, and the Great Enrichment. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(1), pp. 1-24.
• Uen, J. F., Ahlstrom, D., Chen, S. Y. & Tseng, P. W. (2012). Increasing HR's strategic participation: The effect of HR service quality and contribution expectations. Human Resource Management, 51(1), pp.  3-23.
• Van De Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Bolle, C. L., Hegner S. M. & Kommers, P. A. M. (2015). Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior. The role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, pp. 411–420.
• Wang, L. C., Ahlstrom, D., Nair, A. & Hang, R. Z. (2008). Creating globally competitive and innovative products: China's next Olympic challenge. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 73(3), pp. 4-16.
• Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), pp.  490–495.
• Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press
• Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E. & Peng, M. W. (2005). Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (1), pp. 1–33.
• Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M.W. & Deeds, D. L. (2008). What drives new ventures to internationalize from emerging to developed economies? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), pp. 59–82.
• Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D. & Bruton, G. D. (2003). Principal-principal agency. Web Journal of Chinese Management Review, 6(1), pp. 18-45