Continuous professional development biographic characteristics performance strategies teaching learning


Continuous Professional Development is the strategy schools, colleges and universities employ to ensure that teachers and lecturers continue to develop and enhance their professional practice throughout their career lives. The aim of the study was to find out the lecturer’s views towards Continuous Professional Development and the relationship between Continuous Professional Development and lecturer performance in private higher education institutions in Botswana with regards to variables such as gender, work experience, age and educational qualifications. A quantitative research paradigm was adopted and the survey was used as a strategy of inquiry. The collected data was analysed using SPSS package Version 20 and the interpretation was based on Pearson’s R. The findings were that, lecturers in Private Higher Education Institutions viewed Continuous Professional Development positively and regard it as a panacea for professional growth, efficiency and teaching effectiveness. They also perceived strategies for Continuous Professional Development implementation as satisfactory that a lot more with regards to stakeholder involvement was required. The study further showed that biographic characteristics such as gender, experience and qualifications had a positive relationship on lecturer performance after Continuous Professional Development training while age did not have a positive influence on lecturer job performance after going through Continuous Professional Development

Full Text : PDF

  • Adelman, N., Donnelly, M. B., Dove, T., Tiffany-Morales, J., Wayne, A., & Zucker, A. (2002). The integrated studies of educational technology: Professional development and teachers’ use of technology. Washington DC: US Department of Education.
  • Blundell,R., Dearden, L., Meghir ,C. & SianesI, B.(1999).Human Capital Investment: The Returns from Education and Training to the Individual, the Firm and the Economy. Fiscal Studies, 20 (1-23)
  • Bolam, R., Mcmahon, A., StolL, L., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of educational change, 7(4), 221-258.
  • Burbank, M. D., &Kauchak, D. (2003). An alternative model for professional development: Investigations into effective collaboration. Teaching and teacher education, 19(5), 499-514.
  • Craft, A. (2002). Continuing professional development: A practical guide for teachers and schools. London: Routledge.
  • Day, C. (1999). Professional Development and Reflective Practice: Purposes, Processes and Partnerships. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 7(2), 221-33.
  • Donnelly, M. B., Dove, T., Tiffany-Morales, J., Adelman, N., & Zucker, A. (2002). Technology-related professional development in the context of educational reform: A literature review.
  • Arligton, VA: SRI International.
  • Fletcher, S., Strong, M., &Villar, A. (2005). An investigation of the effects of variations inmentor-based induction on the performance of students in California. Sydney: Australia.
  • Fullan, M.G .(1991) The New Meaning of Educational Change .New York: Teachers College Press. Friedman, A., & Phillips, M. (2004). Continuing professional development: Developing a vision.
  • Journal of education and work, 17(3), 361-376.
  • Gallagher, L. (2007). Continuing education in nursing: a concept analysis. Nurse education today, 27(5), 466-473.
  • Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. New York :Teachers College Press.
  • 38   A Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management (ABRM)
  • International Journal of Higher Education Management (IJHEM) Vol. 2  Number 1    August 2015
  • Harland, J., & Kinder, K. (1997). Teachers' continuing professional development: framing a model of outcomes. British Journal of In-service Education, 23(1), 71-84.
  • Hien.T (2009) Towards an Effective Teachers Professional Development in DFLSP. Vietnam: Hanoi. Janet, G.,Day,C.,Lindsay,G., Daniel, M & Harris,A., (2005).Evaluating the Impact of CPD. London:
  • University of Warwick.
  • Maisano, M., Banker, D., & Long, E. (2011). Secondlife—technology facilitating the paradigm shifts from pedagogy to practice for continuous professional development. American Institute of Higher Education 6 th International Conference Proceedings,4(241).
  • Mcgill, I., & Beaty, L. (2001). Action Learning: a guide for professional, management and educational development.USA: Stylus Publishing Limited.
  • Mcdonnell, F., & Zutshi, H. (2010). Inspiring practice: a guide to developing an integrated approach to supervision in children’s trusts. London: Teaching Primary Care Trust.
  • Mizell, H (2010) Why Professional Development Matters. Oxford: Learning Forward.
  • Mphale, L. M. (2014). The Effectiveness of Teachers’ Professional Development Initiatives in Enhancing Teachers Growth in Botswana Secondary Schools Education. International Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 7(1), 75-90.
  • Ofsted (2006).The  logical  chain:  continuing  professional  development  in  effective  schools.  London:
  • O'Sullivan, J (2011) Continuing professional development. Journal of Clinical Nursing 20(23-24) 3561–3566
  • Serpell, Z., & Bozeman, L. (1999).Beginning teacher induction: A report on beginning teacher effectiveness and retention. USA: National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching.
  • Stecher, B., LE, V. N., Hamilton, L., Ryan, G., Robyn, A., & Lockwood, J. R. (2006). Using structured classroom vignettes to measure instructional practices in mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(2), 101-130.
  • Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: an international review of the literature. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning