Instructional Design Models—Framework for Innovative Teaching and Learning Methodologies
Article Metrics Report
Views, downloads, citations, engagementCited by
Current citation countResearch summary
Effective instructional design is essential for efficient teaching and learning outcomes in all disciplines, particularly in the nursing content-laden curriculum. Instructional design model steps and processes enable faculty to determine the scope of the course contents, sequence of instructions, innovative presentation, and evaluation strategies. The generic instructional model of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation (ADDIE) underlies every instructional design process. This paper compares and contrasts the characteristic features, processes, and steps involved in the design of the Dick and Carey instructional design model with the Morrison, Ross and Kemp model using the underlying framework of ADDIE. Each model, with varying degrees of ease of use, employs a nine-step system and procedural processes to provide strategies for creating course instructions. Learner perspective is the focus of each model and the models both have an appeal to course design and specific learning activities within a course. While the Dick and Carey model requires the use of all the components in order to create an instruction, the Morrison, Ross and Kemp model, with its independent or simultaneous use of the elements in any order, and the knowledge that there are cases where not all the nine elements are applied, make the model more flexible and easier to use. Integration of the elements of the Morrison, Ross and Kemp model into the blood transfusion learning activity for
Article History
How to Cite
Obizoba, C.. (2015). Instructional Design Models—Framework for Innovative Teaching and Learning Methodologies. International Journal of Higher Education Management, Volume 02 Issue 1.
Citation Context
APA
Obizoba, C.. (2015). Instructional Design Models—Framework for Innovative Teaching and Learning Methodologies. International Journal of Higher Education Management, Volume 02 Issue 1.
MLA
Obizoba, Cordelia. "Instructional Design Models—Framework for Innovative Teaching and Learning Methodologies." International Journal of Higher Education Management, Volume 02 Issue 1, 2015.
Chicago
Cordelia Obizoba. "Instructional Design Models—Framework for Innovative Teaching and Learning Methodologies." International Journal of Higher Education Management Volume 02 Issue 1 (08 Oct 2015).
Harvard
Obizoba, C. (2015) Instructional Design Models—Framework for Innovative Teaching and Learning Methodologies. International Journal of Higher Education Management, Volume 02 Issue 1
References
- Alkharusi, H., 2008. Effects of classroom practices on students’ achievement goals. Educational Assessment, 13(4), pp.234-66.
- Bastable, S.B., 2008. Nurse as educator: principles of teaching and learning for nursing practice. 3rd ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
- Baturay, M.H., 2008. Characteristics of basic instructional design models. Ekev Academic Review, 12(34), pp.471-82.
- Baum, L.M. and Newbill, P.L., 2010. Instructional design as critical and creative thinking: a journey through a Jamestown-Era Native American village. TechTrends, 54(5), pp.27-37.
- Cato, M.L., Lasater, K. and Peeples, A.I., 2009. Nursing students’ self-assessment of their simulation experiences. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(2), 105-8.
- DeYoung, S., 2009. Teaching strategies for nurse educators. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Dick, W. and Carey, L., 1985. The systematic design of instruction. 2nd ed. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
- 50 A Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management (ABRM) www.ijhem.abrmr.com
- International Journal of Higher Education Management (IJHEM) Vol. 2 Number 1 August 2015
- Finke, L.M., 2009. Teaching in nursing: the faculty role. In: D.M. Billings and J.A. Halstead, eds. 2009. Teaching in nursing: a guide for faculty. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders/Elsevier. pp.3-17.
- Gronlund, N.E. and Waugh, C.K., 2009. Assessment of student achievement. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
- Iwasiw, C.L., Goldenberg, D. and Andrusyzyn, M.A., 2010. Curriculum development in nursing education. 2nd ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
- Kameg, K., Howard, V.M., Clochesy, J., Mitchell, A.M. and Suresky, J.M., 2010. The impact of high fidelity human simulation on self-efficacy of communication skills. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 31(5), pp.315–23.
- Lewis, S.L., Heitkemper, M.M., Dirksen, S.R, O’Brien, P.G. and Butcher, L., 2007. Medical surgical nursing: assessment and management of clinical problems. 7th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.
- Mastrian, K.G., McGonigle, D., Mahan, W.L. and Bixier, B., 2011. Integrating technology in nursing education: tools for the knowledge era. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
- Morrison, G.R., Ross, S.M. and Kemp, J.E., 2004. Designing effective instruction. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- O’Connor, A.B., 2006. Clinical instruction and evaluation: a teaching resource. 2nd ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
- Oermann, M.H. and Gaberson, K.B., 2006. Evaluation and testing in nursing education. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer.
- Tracey, M.W., 2009. Design and development research: a model validation case. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(4), pp.553–71.
- Vandeveer, M., 2009. From teaching to learning: theoretical foundations. In: D.M. Billings and J.A. Halstead, eds. 2009. Teaching in nursing: a guide for faculty. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders/Elsevier. pp.189–226.
- Williams van Rooij, S., 2011. Instructional design and project management: complimentary or divergent? Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(1), pp.139–58.
- Young, K.M., 2000. Informatics for healthcare professionals. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis