<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<issue_export_package generated_at="2026-06-13T13:01:18+00:00">
  <journal>
    <title>International Journal of Higher Education Management</title>
    <acronym>IJHEM</acronym>
    <issn_print>2054-9849</issn_print>
    <issn_online>2054-9857</issn_online>
    <doi_prefix>https://doi.org/10.24052/IJHEM/</doi_prefix>
  </journal>
  <issue>
    <id>6</id>
    <volume>Volume 03</volume>
    <name>Issue 2</name>
    <published_month>2017-02-01</published_month>
    <editorial_pdf_url>https://ijhem.com/cdn/issue_file/editorial_29663_17-03-01-03-12-30.pdf</editorial_pdf_url>
  </issue>
  <articles>
    <article>
      <id>44</id>
      <title>Developing future employees for new and emerging constructs of business: Are current educational models of teaching business up to the task?</title>
      <url>https://ijhem.com/details&amp;cid=44</url>
      <published_date>2017-02-26</published_date>
      <abstract>On a recent trip to Brazil, one of the authors encountered a different model of recruitment and organizational development for an emerging startup software company called Chaordic. The author was impressed with the passion and excitement of the company spokesperson, Anderson Nielson, who explained the model they were using as founded on ACDC - Amore, Consciousness, Discipline, and Commitment (ACDC). Company founder Joao Bernartt, a student of artificial intelligence and his colleague Nielson developed these concepts because they saw them as having great significance for achievements in human history including but not limited to human endeavour and great accomplishment. Bernartt and Nielson were then successful in building them into the foundation of their company through teams, shared goals, learning leadership and accomplishments, all directed towards a common good. Authors Simon Robinson and Maria Morales have expanded on ACDC and developed them within their theory of Holonomics. In this paper, the authors explore these concepts as increasingly relevant for today’s global business world, contrary to the usual managerial and dominant way of thinking about business. If organizations are actually using this philosophy and process as a means of recruitment and simultaneously building their business success, then how should business schools respond, especially when their basic teaching philosophy has as its foundation a framework of traditional managerialism? We suggest that if companies such as our Brazilian company wish to hire employees for their passions, so that they can better contribute to their success, then business schools need to recognize this and provide a new kind of business education, especially as it pertains to a different way of thinking and working.  </abstract>
      <references>Apps, J.,1991. Mastering the Teaching of Adults. Malabar: Krieger. Argyris, C., 1997. Double Loop Learning in Organizations. Harvard Business Review, pp. 115-125. Bradly, D.,2012. August. Jack Welch: An Oral History. Bloomberg Business: The Interview Issue. Chandler, D., &amp; Hwang, H.,2015. Learning From Learning Theory. A Model of Organization Adaption Strategies at the Microfoundations of Instituational Theory. Journal of Management, Vol. 41 no. 5, 1446-1476. doi: 10.1177/0149206315572698 Chaordic. 2015. December.See how academic knowledge influenced the generation facilities for postgraduates. Retrieved from https://chaordic.com.You Will Like It. Cheetham, G. and Chivers, G., 2005.Professions, Competence and Informal Learning. U.K  Edward Elgar. Christensen, C.M. 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma, Harvard Business Review Press.  Collis, J. M.,&amp; Messick, S., 2001. Intelligence and Personality: Bridging the Gap in Theory and Measurement.(Eds.,) Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Collins, J., 2009. How the Mighty Fall and Why Some Companies Never Give In. New York: Harper Collins. Deming. W.E.,n.d. the System of Profound Knowledge. The W. Edwards Deming Institute. Taken from The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education (1993). Retrieved from http://izquotes.com/quote/223654 Deming, W.E., 1994. The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education (2ndEdition). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Centre for Advanced Educational Services. Cambridge, Massachusetts. DeMarco, T., &amp; Lister, T., 2013.  Peopleware: Productive Projects and Teams. 3rd Ed.  Indiana, USA: RR Donnelley. Dylan, Bob, (1964) The Times, They Are A Changin. Retrieved on You Tube Emberg, D., &amp; Benson, L., 2010, Integrating professional skills into a Bachelor of Commerce Program: A case study. Proceedings of EDINEB Conference, June 9-12. 2013. London, United Kingdom.  Girard, B., 2009. The Google Way: How One Company is Revolutionizing Management As We Know It. San Francisco, USA: No Starch Press, Inc. Guy, M.E.,1989. From Organizational Decline to Organizational Renewal: The Phoenix Syndrome. New York: Quorum Books.  Handy, C.,1995.The Empty Raincoat: Making Sense of the Future. Australia: Random House. Hjalmarson, L.,2013. Leadership in a chaortic age. Unpublished monograph. Kelowna, B.C. Access Jan 2016 at  http://nextreformation.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Leadership in Chaordic Age.pdf Hock, D., &amp; Scott, M., 1996.Business Ethics: The Magazine of Corporate Responsibility. Vol. 10, Issue 3, May/June 1996, pp.37-41. Hock, D.,1999. Birth of the Chaordic Age. San Francisco, USA: Berrett-Koehler.  Holonomics Education. 2015.The Holonomic Platform. Retrieved from  http://www.holonomics.co.uk/ Kotter, J. P. (2014). XL Accelerate R8. Massachusetts, USA: Harvard Business School Publishing. Laloux, F.,2014.Reinventing Organizations. A Guide to Creating Organizations Inspired by the Next Stage of Human Consciousness. Brussels, Belgium: Nelson Parker. Landoli, L., &amp; Zollo, G., 2008.Organizational Cognition and Learning: Building Systems for the Learning Organization. IGI Global. PA. USA: Hersey. Leicester, G., &amp; O’Hara, M., 2012.Dancing on the Edge: Competence, Culture and Organization in the 21st Century. Axeminster, Devon: International Futures Forum: Triarchy Press. Leicester, G., Stewart, D., Bloomer, K., &amp; Ewing, J., 2009.Transformative Innovation in Education: A Playbook for Pragmatic Visionaries. U.K. Triarchy Press Ltd. Levitt, B., &amp; March, J. G.,1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology 14:319-340. Manson, M., 2015, October 22. Screw Finding Your Passion. Personal Development That Doesn’t Suck, Access May 26, 2016 at markmanson.net.  1.1    Merriam, S. B., 2001. Andragogy and Self-Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory.SpecialIssue:New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. Volume 2001, Issue 89, pages 3–14. DOI: 10.1002/ace.3 McDermott, J.O.,1997.The Fine Art of Systems Thinking: Essential Skills for Creativity and Problem Solving. London, England: Thorsons. Mintzberg, H., 2005. Managers Not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development. Oakland, Berret_Kohler. Mintzberg, H., 2015. Rebalancing Society: Radical Renewal: Beyond Left, Right, and Center. Oakland: Berret-Kohler. Moody, J.,2015. Have we reached a tipping point for technology? Technological Tipping Points and Societal Impact. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from:  https://agenda.weform.org/2015/09/have-we-reached-a-tippping-point Morgan, G. ,1997. Imaginization: New Mindsets for Seeing, Organizing, and Managing. San Francisco: Berret Koehler Murray-Webster R., &amp; Hillson, D., 2012. Managing Group Risk Attitude. UK: Gower Publishing, Ltd. New York Times, Sept 10, 2014. “Steve Jobs was a Low Tech Parent. Retrieved from https//www.nytimes.com (2014/09/11. Osland, J.S., 2010. Helping Employees Do Their Best Work. J.S. Osland, D.A, Kolb, I.M. Rubin, &amp; M.E.Turner (Eds.). The Organizational Behavior Reader (3rdEd.). Boston: Pearson. Padgett, J. F., &amp; Powell, W.W., 2012. The Emergence of Organizations and Markets. Pedler, M., Burgoyne, J., &amp; Boydell, T., 1997. The Learning Company. A Strategy for Sustainable Development (2nd Ed.). Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. Peters, T., &amp; Barletta, M.,2005. Trends – recognize, analyse, capitalize. New York: DK Publishing Inc. Porras, J.C., 1994. Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies. New York: Harper Collins. Porter, M. E.,1991. Toward a Dynamic Theory of Strategy. Strategy Management Journal, 12 (Winter Special Issue): 95-117. Robinson, K. &amp; Aronica, L., 2009. The Element: How Finding Your Passion Changes Everything. London: Penguin Group. Robinson, S., &amp; Moreas Robinson, M., 2014. Holonomic Business Where People and Planet Matter. Edinburgh, Great Britain: Floris Books. Robinson, S., &amp; Moreas Robinson, M., 2014, April. Holonomic Thinking. Harvard Business Review (Brazil Edition). Retrieved from http://hbrbr.com.br/holonomic-thinking/ Schumacher, E.F.,1973. Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. London, Blond &amp; Briggs. Schmidt, A., 2009. Innovation and Growth in Corporate Restructurings: Solution or Contradiction. Germany: Gabler – Springer Science-Business Media. Semco at www.semco.br Semler, R.,1995. Maverick. New York.HatchetteBookGroup. Semler, R. How to run a company with (almost) no rules, TED,  2015-02-10 Senge, P.M., 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art &amp; Practice of The Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday. Srigley, R.,   March 18, 2016. Pass, Fail: An inside look at the retail scam known as the modern university, The Walrus, Access March 31st, 2016 at  http://thewalrus.ca/pass-fail/ The Economist, 2015, October.Reinventing the Company. The BrazilianS. 2015. April-May-June. Year 42, Number 431.Entrepreneurship. Waldrop, M., 1996, October.The corporate radical who organized Visa wants to dis-organize your company. Fast Company. Weick, K.E., 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. California: Sage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks. Wheatley, M.J., 2009. Turning to One Another: Simple Conversations to Restore Hope to the Future. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Wheatley, M.J., 1999. Leadership and the New Science. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler  </references>
      <pdf_url>https://ijhem.com/cdn/article_file/content_36807_17-03-01-03-13-42.pdf</pdf_url>
      <authors>
        <author>JENNIFER K. BOWERMAN</author>
        <author>RHONDA L. REICH</author>
      </authors>
      <keywords>
        <keyword>ACDC Holonomic thinking managerialism organizational learning organizational change business pedagogy paradigms</keyword>
      </keywords>
      <metrics>
        <views>6266</views>
        <downloads>11</downloads>
        <citations>0</citations>
      </metrics>
      <declarations>
        <funding></funding>
        <conflict_of_interest></conflict_of_interest>
        <data_availability></data_availability>
        <author_contributions></author_contributions>
      </declarations>
      <supplementary_materials/>
    </article>
    <article>
      <id>45</id>
      <title>Revisiting Ghoshal's views on the implications of bad management theory - a systems view of moral governance and managerial practice</title>
      <url>https://ijhem.com/details&amp;cid=45</url>
      <published_date>2017-02-26</published_date>
      <abstract>This paper revisits Ghoshal’s views (2005, 1996) on the implications of bad management theory for managerial practice.  In particular, it examines the persistence of assumptions underpinning moral governance and associated managerial practices in organizations, despite countervailing evidence of efficacy. Drawing on mini-case illustrations, and notions from systems thinking (Senge, 1993, 1999, 2010) and cognitive psychology (Tversky and Kahnemann, 1974), the paper develops a systems perspective that suggests how in some circumstances, cognitive bias rather than intention may explain a paradoxical persistence or adherence to ideology, ideology-based theory and to theory-informed practice.</abstract>
      <references>Ackoff, R. (1974) Redesigning the Future. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons. Badaracco Jr, J.L. (1997) Defining Moments. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press. Badaracco Jr, J.L. (2002) Leading Quietly. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press. Bazerman, M.H. (1998) Judgment in Managerial Decision-Making, New York: Wiley.  Bazerman, M.H. (1984) The relevance of Kahneman and Tversky’s Concept of Framing to Organisational Behaviour. Journal of Management. 10(3): 333- 343. Beer, S. (1981) Brain of the Firm (2nd ed). Chichester: Wiley.  Beer, S. (1985). Diagnosing the System for Organisation, Chichester: Wiley. Boyer, Ernest L. (1990) Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate.  A Special Report for the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. NY: John Wiley, ISBN 0-7879-4069-0. Bozec, R. &amp; Dia, M. (2012) Convergence of corporate governance practices in the post-Enron period: behavioral transformation or box-checking exercise? Corporate Governance. 12(2): 243-256.  Cadbury, Sir A. (1993) Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance 1993. London: Gee Publishing – aka The Cadbury Report. Charkham, J. (1994). Keeping good company, a study of corporate governance in five countries, Oxford: OUP. Collier, J. &amp; Esteban, R. (1999) Governance in the Participative Organisation, Freedom, Creativity and Ethics, Journal of Business Ethics. 21: 173-188. Corbett, L.M. (2011) Lean Six Sigma: the contribution to business excellence.  International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. 2(2):  118-131, DOI 10.1108/20401461111135019. Davies, J. (2015) Exploring issues in change management: Developing a systems perspective on the management of learning and teaching initiatives. International Journal of Higher Education Management. 2(1): 1-16. ISSN: 2054-9849 (print), ISSN: 2054-9857 (online). Davies, J. (2010) Management theory: a systems perspective on understanding management practice and management behavior. International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences. 1(3) July-Sept 2010, 33-48, DOI: 10.4018/ijsds, ISSN: 1947-8569, EISSN: 1947-8577. Davies, J. (2002) Models of Governance - A Viable Systems Perspective. The Australian Journal of Information Systems. 9(2): 57-66.  Davies, J. (2001) The Nature of Governance, multiple frames and a systems view. The Systemist. 23(2): 100-132. De Koning, H., Verver, J.P.S., van den Heuvel, J., Bisgaard, S. &amp; Does, R.J.M. (2006) Lean Six Sigma in healthcare, Journal for Healthcare Quality. 28(2): 4-11.  Doig, A. &amp; Wilson, J. (1998) The effectiveness of codes of conduct. Business Ethics: A European Review. 7(3): 140-149. Donaldson, J. (1992) Business Ethics: A European Casebook. London: Academic Press. Farrell, H. &amp; Farrell, B.J. (1998) The language of business codes of ethics: implications of knowledge and power. Journal of Business Ethics. 17(6): 587-601. Ghoshal, S. &amp; Moran, P. (1996) Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory, Academy of Management Review. 21(1): 13-47. Ghoshal, S., Barlett, C. &amp; Moran, P. (1999) A new manifesto for management, Academy of Management Review. 40(3): 9-20. Ghoshal, S. (2005) Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices, Academy of Management Learning &amp; Education. 4(1): 75-91.  Greenbury, Sir R. (1995) Directors’ remuneration, report of the study group, London: Gee. Haack, P. &amp; Scherer, A.G. (2014) Why Sparing the Rod Does Not Spoil the Child: A Critique of the Strict Father Model in Transnational Governance. Journal of Business Ethics. 122(2): 225-240. Hampel, R. (1998) The Committee on Corporate Governance, Final Report. London: Gee Publishing- aka The Hampel Report. Heil, G, Bennis, W. &amp; Stephens, D.C. (2000) Douglas McGregor, Revisited: Managing the Human Side of Enterprise. New York: Wiley. Higgins, A. &amp; Gordon, F. (1985) Work climate and socio-moral development in two worker-owned companies, in Moral education, theory and application. Berkowitz, M.W &amp; Oser, F. (eds). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 27-87. Hirschman, A.O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. International Charter. (2015) Ethical Corporate Governance: Why does it matter? ICharter, Retrieved from: http://www.icharter.org/articles/ethical_governance.html. Jackall, R. (1984) The Moral Ethos of Bureaucracy. State, Culture and Society, 1(1), 176-200. Johnson, T. (2014) Legends in Black: New Zealand Rugby Greats On Why We Win. Auckland: Penguin Random House. ISBN: 9780143571803. Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking Fast and Slow. London: Allen Lane. Kahneman, D. &amp; Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291. Kahneman, D. &amp; Tversky, A. (1982) Psychology of preferences. Scientific American. 247: 161-173. Kohlberg, L. (1969) Stage and sequence, the cognitive-developmental approach to socialization, in Handbook of socialization theory and research, 347-480, D. Goslin (ed). Chicago: Rand McNally. Kohlberg, L. (1984a) Essays in moral development, Vol, II, The psychology of moral development, Moral stages, their nature and validity. San Francisco: Harper &amp; Row. Kohlberg, L., &amp; Candee, D. (1984b) The relationship of moral judgment to moral action, in Morality, moral behavior and moral development, W.M. Kurtines &amp; J.L. Gerwitz (ed). New York: Wiley, 52-73. Korac-Kakabadse, N., Kakabadse, A.K. &amp; Kouzmin, A.K. (2001) Board Governance and Company Performance, Any Correlations? Corporate Governance. 1(1): 24-30. Kull, T.J., Narasimhan, R &amp; Schroeder, R. (2012)  Sustaining the Benefits of a Quality Initiative through Cooperative Values: A Longitudinal Study, Decision Sciences: 43(4): 553–588, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2012.00359.x Logsdon, J.M. &amp; Yuthas, K. (1997) Corporate social performance, stakeholder orientation, and organizational moral development, Journal of Business Ethics. 16: 1213-1226.  Lumpkin, A., Stoll, S.Y. &amp; Beller, J.M. (1994) Sport ethics, Applications for fair play. St. Louis: Mosby. Maani, K.E. and Cavana, R.Y. (2000) Systems thinking and modelling, Pearson Publishing, Auckland NZ. McGregor, D. (1960) The Human Side of Enterprise. London: McGraw Hill. Menzel, D.C. (1999) The Morally Mute Manager, Fact or Fiction. Public Personnel Management. 28(4): 515-527.  Mintzberg, H. (1979) An emerging strategy of direct research. Administrative Science Quarterly. 24: 105–16.  Nickerson, R.S. (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology. 2(2): 175-220. 1.1.1    Othman, Z. &amp; Rahman, R.A. (2011) Exploration of Ethics as Moral Substance in the Context of Corporate Governance. Asian Social Science.  7(8 ): 173-182. Oxford. (2016). Available from:  http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/ideology Parkinson, J. &amp; Kelly, G. (1999) The Combined Code on Corporate Governance. Political Quarterly. 70(1): 101-107, 527. Payne, D., Raiborn, C. &amp; Askvik, J. (1997) A global code of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics. 16(16): 1727-1735. Rabin. M. (1998)  Psychology and Economics. Journal of Economic Literature. 36(1): 11-46. Ritchey, T. (2011) Wicked Problems - Social Messes: Decision Support Modelling with Morphological Analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. Rossouw, G.J. (2009) The ethics of corporate governance: Global convergence or divergence? International Journal of Law and Management.  51(1), 43-51. Runst, P. (2014) Crisis and belief: confirmation bias and the behavioural political economy of recession. Constitutional Political Economy. 25:376–392. DOI 10.1007/s10602-014-9167-x Russo, J. &amp; Schoemaker, P.J.H. (1994) Confident Decision Making, London: Piatkus Senge, P.M. et al. (1993) The Fifth Discipline, London: Random House Senge, P.M., Kleiner, A. et al. (1999) The Dance of Change, London: Nicholas Brealey, Snell, R.S. &amp; Tseng, C.S. (2002) Moral atmosphere and moral influence under China's network capitalism. Organization Studies. 23(3): 449-478. Snell, R.S. (1993) Developing Skills for Ethical Management. London: Chapman &amp; Hall. Snell, R.S. (2000) Studying Moral Ethos Using an Adapted Kohlbergian Model. Organization Studies. 21(1): 267-295. Snell, R.S. (2001) Moral foundations of the learning organization. Human Relations. March, 319-342. Sonali, K.S. &amp; Corley, K.G. (2006) Building Better Theory by Bridging the Quantitative–Qualitative Divide*, Journal of Management Studies. 43(8): 1821-1856.  Sterman, J. (2000) Business Dynamics: Systems thinking and Modelling for a Complex World, McGraw-Hill, New York.  Stoker, G. (1998) Governance as theory, five propositions, International Social Science Journal. 50(155), 17-28. Stoner, J.A.F. (1968) Risky and Cautious Shifts in Group Decisions, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 4: 442–459.  Stoner, J.A.F. (1961) A Comparison of Individual and Group Decisions Involving Risk. Unpublished master’s thesis, MIT School of Industrial Management, 1961. Trevino, L.K. &amp; Youngblood, S.A. (1990) Bad apples in bad barrels: a causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology. 75(4), 378-385. Tsoukas, H. (2016) Don't simplify, complexify: From disjunctive to conjunctive theorizing in organization and management studies. 54(2): 132-153. Journal of Management Studies. DOI:10.1111/joms.12219 Turnbull, S. (1997) Corporate governance, its scope, concerns and theories. Corporate Governance, An International Review. 5(4): 180-205. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8683.00061 Turnbull, S. (2002) The science of corporate governance. Corporate Governance, An International Review. 10(4), 261-277. Tversky, A. &amp; Kahneman, D. (1974) Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science. New Series, 185(4157): 1124-1131. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1738360 Tversky, A. &amp; Kahneman, D. (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 211: 453-458. Westphal, J.D. &amp; Zajac, E.J. (2013) A behavioral theory of corporate governance: Explicating the mechanisms of socially situated and socially constituted agency. The Academy of Management Annals. 7(1), 607-661.</references>
      <pdf_url>https://ijhem.com/cdn/article_file/content_20734_17-02-25-22-31-26.pdf</pdf_url>
      <authors>
        <author>JOHN DAVIES</author>
      </authors>
      <keywords>
        <keyword>Ethics</keyword>
        <keyword>Governance Moral Governance</keyword>
        <keyword>Theory X Theory &amp; Practice Systems Thinking</keyword>
      </keywords>
      <metrics>
        <views>5944</views>
        <downloads>10</downloads>
        <citations>0</citations>
      </metrics>
      <declarations>
        <funding></funding>
        <conflict_of_interest></conflict_of_interest>
        <data_availability></data_availability>
        <author_contributions></author_contributions>
      </declarations>
      <supplementary_materials/>
    </article>
    <article>
      <id>46</id>
      <title>University's knowledge transfer capacity - organisational structures and regional cooperation</title>
      <url>https://ijhem.com/details&amp;cid=46</url>
      <published_date>2017-02-26</published_date>
      <abstract>The paper presents the analysis of universities' potential for knowledge transfer to the business environment. The first part of the paper shows the analysis of university organisational units related to various parts of the innovation process. Each stage of the process creates distinct challenges for university operations, hence in the paper the basic framework to observe the capacity of organisational structures to respond to them has been constructed. The analysis focuses on relatively large units with complex operations, such as technology transfer centres, as well as on the organisational role of one-man positions, such as dean’s representatives for business relations. The results of the theoretical analysis are referred to the results of the research concerning knowledge transfer practices among universities in Lodz (Poland). A total of thirty-five cases of knowledge transfer practices were included in the analysis. The analysis conducted in the Lodzkie Region covered types of practices, the initiative of carrying out practices, their duration, the nature of practices, their subject scope and impact, as well as risks and benefits associated with implementing knowledge transfer practices. The preliminary exploration, interviews and innovation studies conducted indicate that the analysis covered a vast majority of such practices    </abstract>
      <references>Audretsch, D., Aldridge, T., T., 2009. Scientist commercialization as conduit of knowledge spillovers. Annuals of Regional Science, 43, 897–905. Bessant, J., and Tidd J., 2007. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Chichester: Wiley. Bozeman, B., 2000. Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 627-655, DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1. Brown, R., 2016. Mission impossible? Entrepreneurial universities and peripheral regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation, 23 (2), 189-205, DOI:  10.1080/13662716.2016.1145575.  Bstieler, L., Hemmert M., Barczak G., 2015. Trust Formation in University–Industry Collaborations in the U.S. Biotechnology Industry: IP Policies, Shared Governance, and Champions. Product Development &amp; Management Association, 32(1), 111-121, DOI:  10.1111/jpim.12242. Burgelman, R. A., Christensen, C. M., Wheelwright, S.C., 2004. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Chai, S., Shih, W., 2016. Bridging science and technology through academic–industry partnerships. Research Policy, 45(1), 148-158, doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.007. Conway, S., Steward, F., 2009. Managing and shaping innovation, Oxford: University Press. D’Este P., Patel, P., 2007. University – industry linkage In the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36, 1295–1313.  Drucker, J., Goldstain, H., 2007. Assessing the Regional Economic Development Impacts of Universities: A Review of Current Approaches. International Regional Science Review, 30(1), 20-46. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, Ch., Cantisano Terra B.R., 2000. The future of the university and the University of the Future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330. Głodek, P., Wiśniewska, M., 2015. Uczelniany scouting wiedzy, jako element systemu komercjalizacji wiedzy w ramach uczelni wyższej. Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług, 121, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego nr 891, Szczecin, 279-292. Goduscheit, R., Ch., Knudsen, M. P., 2015. How Barriers to Collaboration Prevent Progress in Demand for Knowledge: A Dyadic Study of Small and Medium-Sized Firms, Research and Technology Organizations and Universities. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(1), 29-54, DOI: 10.1111/caim.12101. Grimpe, Ch., Hussinger, K., 2013. Formal and Informal Knowledge and Technology Transfer from Academia to Industry: Complementarity Effects and Innovation Performance. Industry and Innovation, 20 (8), 683-700, DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2013.856620. Hewitt-Dundas, N., 2012. Research intensity and knowledge transfer activity in UK universities. Research Policy, 41 (2), 262-275.  Hofstede G., Hofstede G. J., Minkov M., 2011, Kultury i organizacje, zaprogramowanie umysłu, 3rd edition, PWE, Warsaw. Huggins, R., Johnston, A., Stride Ch., 2012. Knowledge networks and universities: Locational and organizational aspects of knowledge transfer interactions. Entrepreneurship &amp; Regional Development, 24 (7-8), 475-502, doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.618192. Hughes, A., Kitson, M., 2012. Pathways to impact and the strategic role of universities: new evidence on the breadth and depth of university knowledge exchange in the UK and the factors constraining its development. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36, doi:10.1093/cje/bes017. Krogh, G. Von, 1998. Care in Knowledge Creation. California Management Review, 40(3), p. 133-153. Lehmann, E. E., Menter, M., 2015. University–industry collaboration and regional health. Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-24, DOI 10.1007/s10961-015-9445-4. Lichtenthaler, U., Lichtenthaler, E., 2009. A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1315-1338. Łobacz, K., Niedzielski, P., 2015. Uczelnie wyższe, jako element procesu komercjalizacji wiedzy w Polsce – wyzwania i bariery. In: P. Głodek, M. Wiśniewska, (Eds.), Budowa potencjału uczelni wyższej do współpracy z przedsiębiorstwami. Rola scoutingu wiedzy. Łódź: University of Lodz, 81-104. Maietta, O. W., 2015. Determinants of university–firm R&amp;D collaboration and its impact on innovation: A perspective from a low-tech industry. Research Policy, 44(7), 1341-1359, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.006 Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U. &amp; Woerter, M., 2008, University-Industry Knowledge and Technology Transfer In Switzerland: What University Scientists Think About Cooperation With Private Enterprises, Research Policy, 37, 1865-1883. Muscio, A., Vallanti, G., 2014. Perceived Obstacles to University–Industry Collaboration: Results from a Qualitative Survey of Italian Academic Departments, Industry and Innovation, 21(5), 410-429, DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2014.969935. Pinto, H., Fernandez-Esquinas, M., Uyarra, E., 2015. Universities and Knowledge-intensive Business Services (KIBS) as Sources of Knowledge for Innovative Firms in Peripheral Regions. Regional Studies 49, 1873–1891,  doi.org.ebscohan2320.han3.lib.uni.lodz.pl/10.1080/00343404.2013.85396 Philbin, S. P., 2010, Developing and Managing University-Industry Research Collaborations through a Process Methodology/Industrial Sector Approach, Journal of Research Administration, Vol. XLI, no. 3, 51-68. Probst, G., 1998. Practical Knowledge Management: A Model That Works, Prism, Second Quarter, Arthur D. Little. Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2014, 2014. European Commission, doi: 10.2873/84730. Segarra-Blasco, A., Arauzo-Carod, J-M., 2008. Sources of innovation and industry–university interaction: Evidence from Spanish firms. Research Policy, 37, 1283-1295, doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.003. Shane, S., 2005. Government policies for encourage economic development through entrepreneurship: the case of technology transfer. In: S. Shane (Ed.), Economic development through entrepreneurship. Government, university and business linkages, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 33-49. Smith, H., L., Baghi-Sen, S., 2012. The Research University, entrepreneurship and regional development: Research propositions and current evidence. Entrepreneurship &amp; Regional Development, 24 (5-6), 383-404, doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.592547. Stawasz, E., 2009. Wybrane zagadnienia metodyki oceny projektów transferu technologii. In:  Z. Wysokińska, E. Stawasz, P. Głodek (Eds.), Wybrane metody i mierniki oceny transferu technologii w obszarze innowacyjnych projektów i ich efektów rynkowych, Radom: Instytut Technologii Eksploatacji. Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, 93-120. Stawasz, E., 2015. Determinants of knowledge transfer processes in a region. In: E.  Sobczak, B. Bal-Domańska, A. Raszkowski (Eds.), Local and Regional Economy in Theory and Practice, Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics, 394, Wrocław: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu, 166-174. Tidd J., Bessant J., Pavitt K., 2005, Managing Innovation. Integrating technological market and organizational change. John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd. Van den Ende, J., Dolfsma, W., 2005. Technology-push, Demand-pull and the Shaping of Technological Paradigms: Patterns in the Development of Computing Technology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15(1), 83-99. Wiśniewska, M., Głodek, P., 2015. Scouting wiedzy w ramach uczelni wyższej. In: P. Głodek, M. Wiśniewska (Eds.), Budowa potencjału uczelni wyższej do współpracy z przedsiębiorstwami. Rola scoutingu wiedzy. Lódź: University of Lodz, 11-24</references>
      <pdf_url>https://ijhem.com/cdn/article_file/content_52946_17-02-25-22-36-05.pdf</pdf_url>
      <authors>
        <author>PAWEL GLODEK</author>
        <author>EDWARD STAWASZ</author>
      </authors>
      <keywords>
        <keyword>University commercialisation of knowledge university's organisational structure university's co-operation with the environment</keyword>
      </keywords>
      <metrics>
        <views>5432</views>
        <downloads>14</downloads>
        <citations>0</citations>
      </metrics>
      <declarations>
        <funding></funding>
        <conflict_of_interest></conflict_of_interest>
        <data_availability></data_availability>
        <author_contributions></author_contributions>
      </declarations>
      <supplementary_materials/>
    </article>
    <article>
      <id>47</id>
      <title>Leadership: the linchpin of effective institutional partnerships</title>
      <url>https://ijhem.com/details&amp;cid=47</url>
      <published_date>2017-02-26</published_date>
      <abstract>The Ontario post-secondary environment is divided between colleges and universities, each with differing mandates.  While there is cooperation, this divide has led to competition and conflict between the sectors. The University of Guelph-Humber is a partnership between a college and a university offering an integrated curriculum leading to both a college diploma and a university degree.  This qualitative intrinsic case study was designed to provide insight into the nature, evolution, benefits, and challenges of the partnership.  This paper focuses on what the participants described as the most important aspect of the sustainability of the partnership— leadership. Thirty-three participants were interviewed, documents reviewed, and field observations conducted. The resulting data was interpreted through the lens of Social Interdependence Theory (Deutsch, 2014).  The interpretation of the data showed that senior leadership commitments to the partnership—clearly communicated— were crucial to sustaining the partnership.  Leadership as described in some cases was transformational, but in others as transactional.  In situations of transactional leadership, the goal interdependence (Deutsch, 2014) for followers was directed at career aspirations rather than directed at overarching organizational goals.  Whether employees buy into the goals of the leaders (transformational leadership), or they adopt those goals due to the perception of interdependence between their own career goal and the goals of the leader (transactional leadership), the fact remains that the goals of the leader—clearly communicated—influenced those within the organization.  The weakness observed with more transactional leadership was the lack of motivation to move organizational goals forward during periods of leadership change or absence.  Leadership was the linchpin of the partnership that has sustained an “impressive an example of cooperation between postsecondary sectors as exists anywhere in the world” (Skolnik, 2005, para. 29).  While a linchpin is critical to holding a complex system together, and hence a positive influence on organizations, it is also a great vulnerability when in its absence, the system is left unsupported.</abstract>
      <references>Campbell, R. (2009). Constructive processes: Abstraction, generalization, and dialectics.  In U. Muller, J. Carpendale, &amp; L. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Piaget (pp. 150–170). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Deutsch, M. (2014). Cooperation, competition, and conflict. In P.Coleman, M. Deutsch, &amp; C. Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (3rd ed.; pp. 3–28). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Ellis, G. (2005). Inter-institutional collaboration in Ontario higher education: A case study of the diploma-degree justice studies program at the University of Guelph-Humber (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (Order No. NR029260) Evers, F., &amp; Wolstenholme, J. (2007). Integrating knowledge, skills, and values into the curriculum development process at the University of Guelph-Humber. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2007(112), 83–91. doi:10.1002/tl Glasersfeld, E., von. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer. Glenn, T. (2004). Partners in postsecondary success: The University of Guelph-Humber. Toronto, ON: Institute of Public Administration of Canada. Guba, E., &amp; Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation.Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Hanna, G. (2016). Bridging the educational binary divide: A case study in the sustainability of inter-institutional relationships.(Doctoral dissertation).Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.(Order No. 10100531). Hogan, B., &amp; Trotter, L. (2013). Academic freedom in Canadian higher education: Universities, colleges, and institutes were not created equal. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 43(3), 68–84. Hook, R., &amp; Grant, K. (2008). Operational review of the Guelph-Humber joint venture. Unpublished manuscript. Toronto, ON: University of Guelph-Humber. Johnson, D., &amp; Johnson, R. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(4), 285–358. Kouzes, J., &amp; Posner, B. (2012).  The leadership challenge (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Linchpin. (2016). In Merriam-Webster on-line dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/linchpin Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). [Kindle DX version]. Downloaded from Amazon.ca. Morris, M., Leung, K., Ames, D., &amp;Lickel, B. (1999). Views from inside and outside: Integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgment. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 781–796.  Oakeshott, M. (2003). The idea of a university. Academic Questions, 17(1), 23–30.  Ontario Council on Articulation and Transfer. (2013). Submission to Ministry of Training Colleges and Universities: Roundtable discussion on credit transfer. Retrieved from http://www.oncat.ca/index_en.php?page=reports Pouliot, V. (2007).Sobjectivism: Toward a constructivist methodology. International Studies Quarterly, 51(2), 359–384.  Richardson, L. &amp; St. Pierre, E. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin&amp; Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959–978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.  Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press. Roth, W., &amp; Lee, Y. (2007).Vygotsky’s neglected legacy: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186–232. Schein, E. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rded). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Skolnik, M. (2005). A discussion of some issues pertaining to the structure of postsecondary education in Ontario and some suggestions for addressing them. College Quarterly, 8(1), 1–31.  Skolnik, M. (2011). Re-conceptualizing the relationship between community colleges and universities using a conceptual framework drawn from the study of jurisdictional conflict between professions. Community College Review, 39(4), 352–375.       doi:10.1177/0091552111424205 Stake, R. (1995).The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Stanyon, W. (2003). College university collaboration: An Ontario perspective. College Quarterly, 6(1). Retrieved from http://collegequarterly.ca/2003-vol06-num01-fall/stanyon.html Tsou, J. (2006). Genetic epistemology and Piaget’s philosophy of science. Theory &amp; Psychology, 16(2), 203–224. University of Guelph. (2014). Preliminary 2014/2015 MTCU operating fund budget. Retrieved from https://secure.uoguelph.ca/vpacademic/planning/pdf/IP_MYP2_Preliminary_2014-2015_MTCU_Operating_Fund_Budget.pdf University of Guelph. (2015). U of G, Humber exploring Brampton options. Retrieved from http://news.uoguelph.ca/2015/09/u-of-g-humber-exploring-brampton-options/ University of Guelph, &amp; Humber College. (1999). Memorandum of understanding. Toronto, ON: Authors. University of Guelph, &amp; Humber College. (2004). Joint Venture Agreement. Toronto, ON: Authors. University of Guelph-Humber. (2014). About the University of Guelph-Humber. Retrieved from http://www.guelphhumber.ca/about University of Guelph-Humber.(n.d). The University of Guelph-Humber timeline. Retrieved from http://celebrate.guelphhumber.ca/timeline/ vanEeden, R., Cilliers, F., &amp; van Deventer, V. (2008). Leadership styles and associated personality traits: Support for the conceptualisation of transactional and transformational leadership. South African Journal of Psychology, 38(2), 253-267. Whitaker. C. (2015). President’s message: University of Guelph and Humber College meeting with the City of Brampton. Retrieved from http://humber.ca/staff/president-message/2015-09-21 Yin, R. (2014).Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.</references>
      <pdf_url>https://ijhem.com/cdn/article_file/content_89788_17-02-25-22-37-51.pdf</pdf_url>
      <authors>
        <author>GLENN HANNA</author>
      </authors>
      <keywords>
        <keyword>Leadership Post-secondary Education Partnership Organizational behaviour</keyword>
      </keywords>
      <metrics>
        <views>6139</views>
        <downloads>10</downloads>
        <citations>0</citations>
      </metrics>
      <declarations>
        <funding></funding>
        <conflict_of_interest></conflict_of_interest>
        <data_availability></data_availability>
        <author_contributions></author_contributions>
      </declarations>
      <supplementary_materials/>
    </article>
    <article>
      <id>48</id>
      <title>Some lessons learned in establishing the University of Rwanda</title>
      <url>https://ijhem.com/details&amp;cid=48</url>
      <published_date>2017-02-26</published_date>
      <abstract>The author spent five months in Rwanda as a Strategic Advisor to the Ministry of Education’s Task Force for creating a single national university by amalgamating the existing seven public institutions of higher education located in various regions of the country, and in this article he outlines some of the main lessons learned during that engagement. After providing the contextual background for the project and his engagement by Academics without Borders to undertake it, he summarizes the main outcomes of that work. He then identifies the first lesson learned from this experience as ‘conventional wisdom needs to be applied with pragmatic realism’, particularly when interpreting the fundamental principles of academic freedom, institutional autonomy and participative decision-making. Secondly, he learned that ‘managing expectations can be devilishly difficult’; and finally, it became clear that ‘one should not undertake this kind of work without a local “champion” in place’. The article concludes with the author’s main impressions of Rwanda and its people.    </abstract>
      <references>Academics Without Borders: http://www.awb-usf.org/ Association of Commonwealth Universities: https://www.acu.ac.uk/ Higher education in Africa: http://www.inhea.org/ Rankings of African universities: http://www.webometrics.info/en/Africa Rwanda: http://www.gov.rw/home/, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rwanda Salmi, J. (2009) The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities. The World Bank. University of Rwanda: http://www.ur.ac.rw/</references>
      <pdf_url>https://ijhem.com/cdn/article_file/content_22105_17-02-27-07-00-19.pdf</pdf_url>
      <authors>
        <author>ROBIN H. FARQUHAR</author>
      </authors>
      <keywords>
        <keyword>Higher education</keyword>
        <keyword>international development</keyword>
        <keyword>capacity building</keyword>
        <keyword>Africa</keyword>
        <keyword>Rwanda</keyword>
        <keyword>Academics Without Borders</keyword>
      </keywords>
      <metrics>
        <views>6060</views>
        <downloads>8</downloads>
        <citations>0</citations>
      </metrics>
      <declarations>
        <funding></funding>
        <conflict_of_interest></conflict_of_interest>
        <data_availability></data_availability>
        <author_contributions></author_contributions>
      </declarations>
      <supplementary_materials/>
    </article>
  </articles>
</issue_export_package>
