Deans, leadership failure, faculty members, faculty officers, organisational goals


This paper sought to find out the reasons why in the view of faculty members and officers, some academic Deans in public universities are ineffective leaders. Faculty members and officers of some faculties and schools in University of Cape Coast were requested to first say why in their view; some Deans in University of Cape Coast turn out to be ineffective leaders. Second, they were also requested to give their views on the consequences of leadership failure. Using a qualitative design, the investigators sampled eight (8) faculty members and four (4) faculty officers purposively from four Faculties in University of Cape Coast. Interviewees were asked to consider their own Deans first. A thematic narrative analysis was used to analyse data from the interviews and reported. The results showed that Deans fail due to poor posture, poor interpersonal skill, unclear vision and direction and communication failure. The paper has shown that the consequences of a Dean’s failure affect individual members within the faculty, and create disaffection thus, affecting organisational output. It was therefore recommended that the University Council and Management should consider reviewing the current policy of voting deans into office if it even calls for amendments in the 2016 Statute of the University

Full Text : PDF

  • Allio, R. J. (2007). Bad leaders: How they get that way and what to do about them. Strategy and Leadership, 35(3), 12-17.
  • Bennis, W. & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Belet, D. (2016). Enhancing leadership skills with action learning: a promising way to improve the effectiveness of leadership development. Development and Learning Organisations, 30(6), 13 – 15.
  • Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
  • Coll, K.M., Niles, S.G., Coll, K., A., Ruch, C.P., & Stewart, R.A. (2018). Education Deans: Challenges and Stress. Journal of Organisational and Educational Leadership, 4(1), 2.
  • Crouch, M., & McKenzie, H. (2006). The Logic of Small Samples in Interview-Based Qualitative Research. Social Science Information, 45, 483-499.
  • Creswell, JW (2014). Research design. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. (4th ed). Lincoln: Sage Publications.
  • Diamond, M. A. (2000). Academic Leadership: Turning Vision into Reality. London: The Ernst and Young Foundation.
  • Guest, G., Bunce, A. & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability.  Field Methods, 18, 59-82.
  • Hurrell, S. (2016). Rethinking the soft skills deficit blame game: Employers, skills withdrawal, and the reporting of soft skills gaps. Human Relations, 69, 605–628. doi:10.1177/0018726715591636.
  • Hislop, D. (2003). Linking human resource management and knowledge via commitment: a review and research agenda. Employee Relation, 25(2), 182-202. https//
  • Katz, R. L. (1955). Skills of an effective administrator. Harvard Business Review, 33(1), 33 – 42.
  • Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Enquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Kitto, S. C., Chesters, J., & Grbich, C. (2008). Quality in qualitative research. Medical Journal of Australia, 188(4), 243-246. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377. 2008.tb01595.x
  • Longenecker, O.C., & Ariss, S. S. (2004). Who goes and stays? Industrial Management. 46(3), 8 – 13.
  • Longencker, O.C., & Ariss, S. S. (2005). Why service organisations fail to get desired results: The front-line manager’s perspective. International Journal of Effective Management, 2(1), 6 – 16.
  • Longenecker, C. O. Neubert, M. J. & Fink, L. S. (2007). Causes and consequences of managerial failure in rapidly changing organisations. Business Horizons 50(2) 145-155.
  • Longenecker, C. O., Simonetti, J. L., & Sharkey, T. W. (1999). Why organisations fail: the view from the frontline. Management Decision, 37(6), 503–513.
  • Longenecker, O. C., & Simonetti, J. L. (2001). Getting results: Five absolutes for High performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Connelly, M. S., & Marks, M. A. (2000). Leadership skills. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 155–170. doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(99)00047-8
  • Newby, P. (2010). Research methods for Education, Harlow, Essex, Pearson Education Ltd.
  • Northouse, P. (2013). Leadership: Approach and Practice. (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publishing.
  • Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E. & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1-13.
  • Otara A. (2015). Academic Dean and the Challenges of Meeting Changing Expectations within a Competitive Higher Education Environment in Africa, 6(2), 134-143.
  • Pretorius, M. (2009). Leadership liabilities of newly appointed managers – arrive prepared. Strategy & Leadership, 37(4), 37-42.3
  • Squire, G. (2001). Management as a professional discipline. Journal of Management Studies, 38(4), 473-487.
  • Williams-June, A. W. (2014). To change a campus, talk to the dean. Retrieved from
  • Windsor, C., Douglas, C., & Harvey, T. (2012). Nursing and competencies: A natural fit: The politics of skill/competency formation in nursing. Nursing Inquiry, 19, 213–222. doi:10.1111/j.1440- 1800.2011.00549.x
  • Wong, L. (2008). Data analysis in qualitative research: A brief guide to using Nvivo. Malaysian Family Physician: The Official Journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 31, 14-20.